Our company has inherited the reputation as a byproduct of the talent of our skilled professionals in designing supreme quality cooling tower nozzles. These cooling tower nozzles are designed in different dimensions according to the specifications that are laid by the customers. These are available in different types such as flower type, umbrella type, ampullar type and spray type. Our range is designed by using supreme quality polypropylene or polyethylene plastic which our company purchases from the most trusted vendors in this domain.
Of course, the most obvious impact of a nozzle is due to its primary job of getting the hot water to the fill. Ideally, the nozzles are located and sized so that they provide a uniform pattern of water over the fill with no gaps between their spray areas. You’ve spent a “few dollars” to put fill into your cooling tower, so now you need to make sure that you utilize it to its fullest extent by making sure that it is totally wetted out and all sections of fill receive a constant amount of water. All published performance data for a fill is based upon this assumption.
Gaps in spray coverage can lead to air bypass because dry fill offers lower resistance to airflow, and air will always take the path of least resistance. This will result in airflow being stolen from wet fill sections where it is needed to cool the hot water. Also, since air and water are both fluids, the gaps are not 100% constant in their location. As the competing fluids interact with each other they tend to pulse and shift around. This causes some of the fill to experience alternating cycles of wet and dry times which will promote scale formation within the fill. As scale builds up in a fill it starts to adversely affect its thermal performance capability, and in the extreme, can totally block airflow from the fill and potentially cause structural damage to the cooling tower if the fill’s weight gain from the scale is excessive.
With ever-increasing scrutiny being paid to drift emissions from cooling towers, you have to be aware of the role that the nozzles can play on drift. Unfortunately, the fine spray of very small droplets that is beneficial from a cooling perspective creates a much more difficult challenge in preventing those same very small droplets from exiting the cooling tower as drift. This can be made even worse if the circulating water has very low surface tension due to water treatment that includes surfactants or due to compromised make-up water sources from wastewater treatment plants, such as California Title 22 water.
As the surface tension of the water decreases, it causes smaller and smaller droplets to be formed. When you combine this with a pressurized water distribution system, especially if you are overpumping it and have a higher than expected pressure at the nozzles, you can actually generate a mist. As mentioned in the November 2015 edition of The Cooling Quarterly, mist droplets can be a couple orders of magnitude smaller than the typical drift droplets for which drift eliminators are designed to capture, and drift eliminators lose their efficiency if the droplets are too small. (This is why there are mist eliminators, which are designed differently from drift eliminators because of the greater degree of difficulty in droplet removal).